For Small Firm Attorneys ·
What you'll accomplish
Right now, a batch of produced discovery documents costs you one to three hours of reading before you can even start deciding what matters. With Claude set up as a dedicated discovery workspace, that same batch turns into a 20 to 30 minute review of an organized summary, one you still check against the original pages before relying on it.
What you'll need
The free tier of Claude works for quick questions, but reviewing discovery documents at any real volume needs the file upload limits and Project features that come with a paid plan.
What you should see: Your account dashboard shows the paid plan active, and an option to create a new Project appears in the sidebar. Troubleshooting: If you already use Claude for personal tasks, consider a separate account for firm work so client-related uploads stay in one place and are easier to track for billing and confidentiality purposes.
Claude's Projects feature keeps a set of uploaded documents and conversation history together under one matter, so you are not re-uploading files every time you have a follow-up question.
What you should see: An empty Project workspace with a place to add files and a chat window. Troubleshooting: If you handle multiple matters, create a separate Project for each one. Mixing documents from different clients in one Project risks confusing which facts belong to which case.
Before uploading anything, screen the batch for content that should not leave your firm's systems in its current form.
What you should see: A folder of reviewed documents ready to upload, with sensitive identifiers removed where they are not needed for your analysis.
What you should see: A list of the uploaded files in the Project's file panel, confirming they were received. Troubleshooting: If a file fails to upload, check its size and format. Very large scanned PDFs sometimes need to be split into smaller batches.
In the chat window, describe exactly what you want. Vague requests produce vague summaries, so be specific about the format.
What you should see: A structured response, usually with headers or a table, organizing the documents by date or topic with citations to which uploaded file each point came from.
Do not treat the summary as the record. Open the original document for each item Claude flagged as important and confirm it says what the summary claims.
What you should see: A verified set of notes you can trust to build your case theory or prep a deposition outline from, because you have personally confirmed the key facts.
Chronological organization:
Organize these documents into a timeline by date, with a one-sentence description
of what each document shows.
Fact-specific flagging:
Flag every document that mentions [specific term, person, or dollar amount], and
quote the exact sentence where it appears.
Inconsistency check:
Compare these documents and flag any place where dates, dollar amounts, or
descriptions of the same event do not match.
Deposition prep handoff:
Based on these documents, list the five most important facts I should ask this
witness about, with the document and page each fact comes from.